Ask yourself these questions regarding the evolution theory:

If evolution supposedly produced us, then why couldn't it produce any of these things mentioned over the same time period "we" supposedly evolved? What is more complicated... a watch or ring, or your human body? A single CELL is far more complicated than a watch, ring or painting... and even a car.

We look at a watch and easily conclude that it was made by some intelligence. If I told you that your watch just evolved, you'd consider me crazy. Yet millions look at the complicated collection of cells we call the human body (or that of a fly) and conclude that it just happened, by chance?

We know that life can only come from life... the "law" of biogenesis. So why do we try to also say that all life came from non-life through "evolution," only to revert right back to the physical fact we all except... life can only come from life?

Do the watches, houses, paintings, etc., of the world come from something living or something non-living? From something intelligent or from something with no intelligence? Is there even one painting that has ever evolved? One house? One watch? NO! It took something living, with intelligence, to produce any of those things. We discover cave paintings and we automatically conclude that human beings produced those paintings... WHY? Why don't we find a cave with carvings or paintings and accept the fact that they evolved from the same process that we evolved though? Why do we assume, without hesitation, that intelligence produced those items?

If evolution were a fact of science and the universe, there should be an infinite number of "evolved" things that would be at our disposal. Early mankind should have had access to watches, cars, houses, rings, and a million (or billion) other inanimate items that evolution should certainly have produced given an infinite amount of time and chances. The very fact that this isn't the case should make us realize that intelligence is responsible for every aspect of creation, both inanimate and living.

"Irreducible Complexity," a proven fact within science that reveals that many living structures and functions, such as the human eye, blood clotting, etc., couldn't have been at a lesser stage of "evolution" because the structure or function wouldn't have happened. (i.e. the eye couldn't "see" and blood wouldn't "clot," and the creature would have died before it could have evolved.) This scientific fact is NOT a factor in the production of something as simple as a ring or a painting. A ring or painting (and a million similar items) could easily evolve from one step to another and STILL be a ring or painting. Yet, we still don't have evidence of ANY such items evolving. However, we have a vast number of living creatures, most of incredible complexity, and we foolishly conclude that they chanced into this complexity.

Another question: How is it that the universe reveals a law called "entropy," which is basically showing us that things are moving from a more ordered state to a LESS ordered state? If evolution was the result of JUST THE OPPOSITE... going from a less ordered state to a more (and MUCH more) ORDERED STATE, OVER TIME, how is it that we see just the opposite in science and the universe?

For evolution to be valid, it would mean that there HAD to be something which "drove" such an "ordering" of matter, with obvious design behind the ordering. How can or would "time and chance" have ANY motive or drive (not to mention intelligence greater than what is evolving) to IMPROVE, structure, order, or in any other way, bring about a MORE complex life form? How can a less intelligent, blind chance bring about an ordered structure or life form GREATER than itself? Is this rationally possible?

Time and chance is used to explain the evolutionary process. Any reasonable mind would agree that time and chance could produce a possible result, however unlikely, ONE TIME. However, to believe that such a "time and chance" process could produce the same incredible result, millions or billions of times over billions of years... is a complete leap of faith FAR greater than any religion or belief system on the planet requires. For grown, educated adults to even entertain this concept to be valid, and even fight to maintain it, is the greatest foolishness and show of ignorance possible.

Do we have the courage and intelligence to admit that there IS a "Universal Creative Intelligence" that calls Himself God, and begin to conduct ourselves accordingly?

And another question: We have how many distinct races of people on Earth today? Consider for a minute the belief that all life slowly changed over the course of millions and even billions of years. Let's use just the human species as an example. Today, if you have a black person and a white person reproduce, you get a mix of both... traits of white and black in the offspring. If that child mates with, say a white person, the child to follow will have more white genes than black, and vice verse. Continue the same trend and the black genes will disappear completely. There is nothing to prevent any race from mating with another race of people on earth. So... imagine just one million years of "evolution" where our "ancestors," whatever they were prior to intelligence and free will, mating with any other pre-human whatever. How can you have, today, distinct racial genetics that haven't been diluted with every other pre-human mating that had to have taken place?

In other words, how could distinct races even exist today where there would have been a constant mixing of genetic material in even ONE million years of "evolution," let alone a billion? What prevented all these distinct creatures from intermingling... and having ANY chance of their distinctness showing up later on? Evolutionists love to use "time" to explain the slow development of life on Earth, but you can't have this time element on the one hand supposedly allowing the evolutionary changes to occur, and yet stop it from having an impact on the very development of species and/or races. If time allowed the human species to develop, how is it that we have such distinct races today, and HOW is it possible, given millions upon millions of years of reproduction, that race could even hope to exist as a separate, distinct thing?

Evolution and time both make it impossible for species-specific life to form, given the vast amount of "chances" for interaction and gene mixing that millions of years present. Multiply this one mathematical impossibility by all the number of distinct species on Earth, and you have an even greater impossibility that evolution could possibly have occurred and still produce distinction of so many species.

Some may try to explain it away by saying that all races and species of life evolved" in vacuum... completely separated from each other and having no interaction. Imagine all the pre-lizards, or pre-snakes, or pre salamanders... never getting together, NEVER mating together? Over a million years of evolution? NEVER??? Not ONE of these evolving "distinct" species or life form? How can these pre-species, of which there were millions, have escaped mating with other pre-species way back in the beginning? In order for the species to even make it to the modern world, it would have had to remain distinct from day one and NOT be polluted with foreign genetic material from any other similar species. Evolution is a mindless genius if anyone can even entertain such impossibilities.

The answer is clear: There IS a divine creator of all life on Earth, designed by Him and established within their genetic bounds. Logic and reason from science alone prove this, for those who are willing to hear the truth.

Godkind web pages created and material written by Jeffrey T. Maehr. Copyright © 1997- 2008. All rights reserved. Reproduction allowed if credit to this website is listed with material. All other authors or copyrights listed accordingly.